DokuWiki

It's better when it's simple

User Tools

Site Tools


faq:approval

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Both sides next revision
faq:approval [2010-12-27 00:25]
79.22.176.107
faq:approval [2015-04-27 03:11] (current)
118.92.240.103 old revision restored (2014-03-25 22:19)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Can changes be approved before publishing them? ====== ====== Can changes be approved before publishing them? ======
  
-Is there any kind of moderation do you/he/she/it work available flow force page do you/he/she/it compile approved being from a[ [admin]] before do I/they have published?+:?: Is there some kind of moderation work flow available to force page edits being approved by an admin before they are published?
  
-:!: A Wiki is not a system of the book industry in the traditional sense. Wiki means rapid in Hawaiian. Moderation of you/he/she/it compile begin the express out of[ [wiki]] and he/she/it/you makes it practically useless. This is [perchè] there is nobody this thing in DokuWiki.+:!: A Wiki is not a publishing system in the traditional sense. Wiki means quick in Hawaiian. Moderation of edits takes the quick out of wiki and renders it practically useless. This is why there is no such thing in DokuWiki.
  
-People thinks about install a[ [wiki]] he/she/it/you for the first thick time does the error think about restrictions also much.+People thinking about installing a wiki for the first time often make the mistake to think about restrictions too much.
  
-My recommendation is: don't add any restrictions until he/she/it/you needs them. Everything leaves openshe/she/it/you sees it like you/he/she/it workyou/he/she/it then repair. Give a case to the community handle vandals and[ [spammers]] if the place is useful to the people that they will hold cleans. If opening is not a choice perhaps a[ [wiki]] it is not the correct utensil to all.+My recommendation is: don't add any restrictions until you need them. Leave everything opensee how it works, then adjust. Give the community a chance to handle vandals and spammers if the place is useful to the people they will keep it clean. If opening is not an option maybe a wiki isn'the right tool at all.
  
-This is particularly true in the job. If he/she/it/you wants to leave the power of job of the[ [wiki]] for you and your company that must authorize your employees. Give an easy use utensil and the liberty use it in their own street.+This is especially true in the workplace. If you want to let the power of wiki work for you and your company you have to empower your employees. Give them an easy to use tool and the freedom to use it in their own way.
  
-However, there is the [[plugin:publish|Publish-plugin]], that has left us that he/she/it/you has put the social condition of the approval of a page.  +However, there'the [[plugin:publish|Publish-plugin]], that lets you set a page's approval status.
- +
- +
  
  
faq/approval.1293405951.txt.gz · Last modified: 2010-12-27 00:25 by 79.22.176.107